Posted by
This Observer
on
Tuesday, 20 October 2009

This article from the BBC has just depressed me. Not because it's unfair or badly written (as you might legitimately expect a BBC article to be) but rather because it reminds me that the Tory top brass can be just as retarded on occasion as their Labour counterparts.
For those too lazy to follow the link above, the BBC report is of David Cameron's new "initiative" to force local Conservative associations to pick candidates from all-female shortlists.
The idea is apparently to push up the number of women MP's in parliament; a worthy aim to be sure, it's just that this aim is going to be achieved by artificial means and probably at the expense of some extremely able candidates who's only flaw appears to be that they are of the wrong sex.
Surely it stands to reason that as a (hopefully) incoming government, we'd want the very best people possible representing us. Be they female or otherwise. Narrowing our options down to all-female shortlists is needlessly cutting off perfectly good candidates for the purposes of looking "balanced".
"What utter bullshit this is!", says this observer. A more gender-balanced ratio of MP's in the party would indeed be great, but the way to achieve that is to encourage more women to stand as candidates in the first place, not needlessly pushing through ridiculous and divisive rules to temporarily boost headline figures.
Over the last 12 years (and to be fair, also before) Labour have been characterised as a party of spin rather than substance, as a party who regulate away problems instead of encouraging and helping people to better themselves... Let's not as a party fall straight into the temptation of doing exactly the same simply because it grabs headlines and looks like the easy option.
UPDATE: Excellent articles on this have since appeared on Iain Dale's blog
here, at the Spectator
here and also over at Con Home
here.